A new bill proposed by an Illinois lawmaker has garnered much attention, but what is it and could it actually be passed in the state?
House bill 4603, a bill that would restrict the reasons a copy can pull you over, was introduced by Justin Slaughter, who represents parts of Chicago’s South Side and south suburbs.
And while the contents of the bill have been raising eyebrows, some officials, including Slaughter, say it's unlikely it will go much further.
What is HB4603?
House bill 4603 would change the motor vehicle code to prohibit police stops for minor offenses like failing to display license plates or expired stickers, as well as excessively tinted windows, defective mirrors, defective bumpers or excessive exhaust.
Advocates for criminal justice reform have often pointed to minor traffic stops as a source of tension between police and the community.
But the most controversial part of the bill involves stops for speeding that would not result in misdemeanors or felonies. In Illinois, that means speeding 25-35 miles an hour over the limit.
Local
What are experts saying about it?
Many experts say the largest issue with the bill centers on the speeding guidance.
Feeling out of the loop? We'll catch you up on the Chicago news you need to know. Sign up for the weekly Chicago Catch-Up newsletter here.
"If you think about that," said Jim Kaitschuk, executive director of the Illinois Sheriff’s Association, "you are in a 30-mile-an-hour speed zone in a residential area and somebody’s going 50 and we can’t stop the vehicle?"
Kaitschuk said that could create a huge safety issue when there are children playing in the neighborhood.
He also worries that drunk driving enforcement could be handcuffed by the bill, which also limits an officer's ability to pull over a vehicle for improper lane changes. Weaving from lane to lane, he said, is often a tell-tale sign of a DUI.
"And under this, we wouldn't have been able to stop them," Kaitschuk said.
Isaac Waddell of Pilsen said he supports the measure because it shows respect for the community.
"Doing arbitrary traffic stops wastes time and money," he said. "There are other things they should be doing like engaging with the community rather than harassing them."
Arturo Garza said he sees it another way. "It’s going to be pure chaos, crime is going to go up; violations are going to go up; accidents are going to go up,” he said.
What's next for the bill?
Slaughter introduced the bill on Monday, but it has attracted no co-sponsors.
So far, he has not responded to repeated calls and emails from NBC 5. However, Kaitschuk said Slaughter called him Wednesday morning to tell him he was not going to move forward with the bill in its current form.
"I appreciated the conversation I had with Rep. Slaughter," Kaitschuk said. "His indication was this bill went way too far for where he intended for it to go."
Slaughter has yet to say if or when he will bring the bill back or what changes he might make.
