No Do-Over of Rams-Saints NFC Championship Game After Further (Judicial) Review - NBC Chicago
National & International News
The day’s top national and international news

No Do-Over of Rams-Saints NFC Championship Game After Further (Judicial) Review

Fan reaction to the pivotal play in New Orleans included disbelief, anger and resignation, and at least two lawsuits

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    NFL Commissioner on Saints No-Call: 'It’s a Play That Should Be Called'

    NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell addressed the controversial no-call from the Rams-Saints NFC championship game, saying the league never wants officiating to be what people are talking about.

    (Published Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2019)

    A courtroom quest by two New Orleans Saints ticketholders for a full or partial do-over of this year's NFC championship game because of a blown "no-call" by game officials was rejected Thursday by a federal judge.

    NFL officials have acknowledged that flags should have been thrown when a Rams defensive back leveled a Saints receiver with a helmet-to-helmet hit at a crucial point in the final minutes of regulation time. The Rams won the Jan. 20 conference championship in overtime and are set to play the New England Patriots in Sunday's Super Bowl in Atlanta.

    Fan reaction in New Orleans has included disbelief, anger and resignation, expressed in newspaper headlines, billboards ("They reffed up" said one), promises by some restaurants and bars that they won't show the Super Bowl broadcast, and posters of blind referees.

    And at least two lawsuits. One was a class-action lawsuit on behalf of ticketholders that was awaiting action in state court.

    The other was filed by season ticketholders Tommy Badeaux and Candis Lambert two days after the game. It sought a court order called a writ of mandamus forcing the NFL to implement a rule allowing Commissioner Roger Goodell to investigate "extraordinarily unfair acts" that affect the game. Remedies under that rule include rescheduling the game in full, or from the point at which the unfair act occurred.

    In a statement Thursday evening, Frank D'Amico, an attorney for Badeaux and Candis, gave no indication he would appeal U.S. District Judge Susie Morgan's ruling regarding the writ of mandamus. He said there remains an unresolved issue involving Saints season ticketholders' rights "to purchase tickets for the Super Bowl at face value to see the Saints play in that game." But he gave no details on his next move.

    The NFL did not respond to an emailed request for comment.

    "None of the actions Plaintiffs might seek to compel Commissioner Goodell to do are the kinds of actions a writ of mandamus may address," Morgan said in a 17-page ruling in which she detailed the extraordinary circumstances in which Louisiana law allows such an order to be issued.

    In the same ruling, she also rejected arguments that the case should be heard in state court in New Orleans, where it was originally filed. She said the suit was, in effect, a class-action lawsuit seeking relief for all ticketholders and Saints fans, involving defendants outside of Louisiana and amounts of money that all make it appropriate for federal court.

    Goodell addressed the no-call for the first time Wednesday in his annual Super Bowl news conference. He said the call should have been made correctly but the NFL never considered reversing the result of the game.

    Saints quarterback Drew Brees said on the TODAY show Friday that Goodell didn't seem to say much at the news conference, but said that what happened with the "very, very obvious call" is out of Saints' fans hands. 

    "You have to worry about the things that you can control and that's something you don't control. We would have liked for that call to have been made but it wasn't," Brees said.