Here's How to See If Cambridge Analytica Got Your Data - NBC Chicago

Here's How to See If Cambridge Analytica Got Your Data

Amid a flurry of Facebook announcements about privacy settings and data access, it's not at all clear how much Facebook can shift without undermining what makes it one of the world's most profitable companies



    Facebook Readies Data-Use Notices; Zuckerberg at Capitol

    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is meeting privately with lawmakers on Monday ahead of his first time testifying on Capitol Hill and the company's expected revelation of which users were swept up in the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Sharon Katsuda reports.

    (Published Monday, April 9, 2018)

    Some Facebook users have been receiving alerts Tuesday that their data was improperly obtained by political data-mining firm Cambridge Analytica.

    The firm improperly obtained personal information from up to 87 million users by allowing the makers of an app called "This Is Your Digital Life" access to the friends of people who logged in. Facebook had planned to alert users affected by the breach on Monday, but the efforts were delayed.

    Didn't get a notification?You can still see if your data was improperly shared with Cambridge Analytica by clicking here. (Make sure you're logged into Facebook.)

    And here's NBC News' guideto seeing what information Facebook has collected on you.

    Facebook: To Delete or Not to Delete?

    [NATL] Facebook: To Delete or Not to Delete?

    As more details emerge about the data privacy scandal surrounding the Trump-connected firm Cambridge Analytica and Facebook, some users are revisiting the concept of leaving the social media site. The hashtag "Delete Facebook" is trending online as Americans vow to take a step back from the social network following reports of misuse of some 50 million profiles. NBC News' Liz McLaughlin reports.

    (Published Friday, March 23, 2018)

    The page also directs users to the settings page where they can update what information they share with apps and websites. Facebook says it's banned the "This Is Your Digital Life" app.

    The revelation of who was affected in the Cambridge Analytica breach comes amid a flurry of Facebook announcements about privacy settings, data access and CEO Mark Zuckerberg's trip to the Capitol, where he is scheduled to testify to Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday.

    Lost in the activity is a much more fundamental question: Is Facebook really changing its relationship with users, or just tinkering around the edges of a deeper problem — its insatiable appetite for the data it uses to sell ads?

    Zuckerberg has long defined the company's mission as making the world more open and connected. He's now tweaking that high-minded goal to emphasize positive community-building, not just connectivity. But it's not at all clear how much Facebook can shift without undermining what makes it one of the world's most profitable companies.

    "Why is connectivity a good thing? Once you begin to challenge that, you begin to question the business model, which is about mining our data," said Richard John, a Columbia University professor of business history. Facebook is "extraordinarily reliant on the goodwill of users" who allow it to harvest what they share about themselves, he said — much more so than other tech companies.

    Wall Street analysts are already counting on Facebook to survive a user revolt. Based on recent polling, GBH Insights analyst Daniel Ives expects roughly 15 percent of users to disengage somewhat from the social network following the Cambridge Analytica revelations. In a worst-case scenario, decreased engagement and what Ives terms a "negligible" number of deleted accounts could cost the company up to $2 billion in annual advertising, Ives said.

    Facebook Exodus? Users Search for Alternatives in Wake of Scandal

    [NATL-BAY] Facebook Exodus? Users Search for Alternatives in Wake of Scandal

    It has been a rough week for Facebook, both on the stock market and in the court of public opinion. With few answers as to how user data will be safer in the future, some people say they're leaving Facebook and searching for social alternatives. NBC Bay Area's Scott Budman reports.

    (Published Thursday, March 22, 2018)

    Facebook could likely survive a $2 billion cut in its bottom line. Its shares have rebounded after hitting their lowest price in nine months in late March. Since then, the stock has climbed about 4 percent to $158.61 at midday Monday.

    Less clear is how Facebook will handle the threat of increased regulation if Zuckerberg does not adequately resolve lawmakers' concerns this week.

    "Could Facebook still exist even though you have greater privacy protections? That's the billion-dollar question," said University of Tennessee law professor Maurice Stucke, who has argued against allowing a handful of tech companies to monopolize everyone's personal data.

    In the days leading up to Zuckerberg's testimony, Facebook has implemented a series of changes. It took yet another stab at explaining what happens to user data on its service and rejiggered its confusing privacy controls for the seventh time in a decade.

    The company announced an independent commission that will have access to Facebook data to study the effects of social media on elections and democracy. Last week, it announced new transparency and verification rules for advertisers and page administrators.

    Facebook is also restricting the access that outside parties have to data from Facebook users and groups, and it removed an option to search for users by entering a phone number or an email address that it said "malicious actors" had abused to scrape information from nearly all Facebook users.

    Mark Zuckerberg Fires Back at Tim Cook

    [NATL-BAY] Mark Zuckerberg Fires Back at Tim Cook

    Mark Zuckerberg has fired back at Tim Cook after the Apple CEO criticized Facebook amid its scandal surrounding its data practices. Scott Budman reports.

    (Published Monday, April 2, 2018)

    Researchers generally consider such steps positive, if insufficient. Stucke, for instance, said a much stronger move would be for Facebook to fold U.S. users into the more stringent data protections the European Union will impose on internet companies starting May 25.

    Zuckerberg has been unclear about whether Facebook would extend the European protections to the U.S. and elsewhere. He said recently the company will make its "controls and settings the same everywhere, not just in Europe," although it wasn't clear exactly what he meant, nor how that would affect data collection and privacy.

    Privacy advocates are calling for Facebook to embrace the European rules globally. In an open letter sent Monday to Zuckerberg and lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic, a group called the Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue said the law will offer "protections that all users should be entitled to no matter where they are located."

    Researchers such as Stucke worry that Facebook might be able to wait out the pressure. "There's a big commotion," he said. "You hire a lot of lobbyists. You pressure the agencies not to do anything and just ride it out until the next scandal."

    But Jeffrey Chester, executive director for the Center for Digital Democracy, said it would be a mistake to view Facebook's current turmoil as a "one-time event." Thanks to the European rules, he said, "there's a noose that's tightening around the necks of the Googles and the Facebooks" that will eventually force changes in their business models."

    Some who favor stricter regulations want Facebook users to be treated like the advertising products that they are and to be paid for what they contribute to the social network. A few scholars say Facebook has so much influence over media and society that the U.S. government should consider taming its dominance by forcing it to spin off Instagram, WhatsApp or other businesses.

    Schiff and Turner Argue Over Value of Sondland Testimony

    [NATL] Schiff and Turner Argue Over Value of Sondland Testimony

    Reps. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Mike Turner, R-Ohio, offer up differing assessments as to the value of Ambassador Gordon Sondland’s testimony on Wednesday.

    (Published Wednesday, Nov. 20, 2019)

    "We're in totally unprecedented waters," said Lina Khan, a Yale law professor and director of legal policy with the Open Markets Institute. "I wouldn't be too conservative about what's realistic."

    Others who find the European model too onerous say most U.S. consumers don't care if Facebook analyzes them and their friends in a way that keeps what they share anonymous.

    Such data collection "doesn't create a lot of harm and can create some significant benefits," said Joe Kennedy, a fellow at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, which is backed by the technology industry.

    He cited targeted ads as a boon to consumers and said the data behind them can boost artificial intelligence systems, which use vast quantities of data to "learn" human-like behavior.

    NBC's Asher Klein contributed to this report.