President Donald Trump has signed more than 70 executive orders in his first month as president.
Among the executive orders Trump has signed are efforts to eliminate birthright citizenship, gain more presidential control over the federal bureaucracy and workforce, and eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion measures.
This week, measures surrounding IVF, federal regulation and benefits for immigrants were among the newest additions.
Here's a look at what happened this week:
Downsizing Federal Bureaucracy
Trump listed four targets in his executive order on Wednesday, focusing on more organizations as he tries to downsize the federal bureaucracy. The list included the United States Institute of Peace, which promotes conflict resolution around the world, and the Presidio Trust, which manages a park in San Francisco.
Both organizations were created by Congress. The executive order said they âshall reduce the performance of their statutory functions and associated personnel to the minimum presence and function required by law.â
Politics
Trump also directed the elimination of various advisory panels, including the Health Equity Advisory Committee, the Advisory Committee on Long COVID and the Community Bank Advisory Council.
Federal regulation
Feeling out of the loop? We'll catch you up on the Chicago news you need to know. Sign up for the weekly Chicago Catch-Up newsletter.
Trump is moving to give the White House direct control of independent federal regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission.
The executive order that Trump signed Tuesday gives the president more power to shape the oversight of the financial system and lay out criteria for transportation safety, basic consumer protections and wireless, broadcast, satellite and broadband communications.
It is part of a broader push by the Trump administration to assert greater authority over the government, possibly limiting the spending of congressionally approved funds in ways that could set up lawsuits and lead courts to weigh in.
IVF
Trump has signed an executive order meant to expand access to and reduce costs of in vitro fertilization and issued a presidential memorandum calling for âradical transparency requirementsâ from the government, which he suggested could reduce wasteful spending.
âAmericans need reliable access to IVF and more affordable treatment options, as the cost per cycle can range from $12,000 to $25,000,â the order said. âProviding support, awareness, and access to affordable fertility treatments can help these families navigate their path to parenthood with hope and confidence.â
The order instructed the assistant to the president for domestic policy to give Trump a list of policy recommendations on protecting IVF access and âaggressively reducing out-of-pocket and health plan costs for IVF treatmentâ within 90 days.
Office of Management and Budget
Trump also signed another executive order as well as a presidential memorandum Tuesday. The second executive order outlined the oversight functions of the Office of Management and Budget, while the memo requires the government to detail the âwaste, fraud and abuseâ thatâs found as the Department of Government Efficiency, overseen by Tesla CEOÂ Elon Musk, looks to cut government spending.
Immigrant benefits
Trump has signed an order aimed at ending federal benefits for people in the country illegally, the White House said Wednesday, his latest in a blizzard of moves to crack down on immigration.
The White House said the order seeks to end âall taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal aliens,â but it was not clear which benefits will be targeted. People in the country illegally generally do not qualify except for emergency medical care. Children are entitled to a free K-12 public education regardless of immigration status under a 1982 Supreme Court ruling.
The order notes that a 1996 welfare overhaul denies most public benefits to people in the country illegally but says that law has been gradually undermined. âOver the last 4 years, in particular, the prior administration repeatedly undercut the goals of that law, resulting in the improper expenditure of significant taxpayer resources.â