Dutch Autopsy Shows Dead War Criminal Had Cyanide in System - NBC Chicago
National & International News
The day’s top national and international news

Dutch Autopsy Shows Dead War Criminal Had Cyanide in System

The announcement came after Croatia's justice minister raised doubts about whether security and medical staff at the tribunal responded quickly enough to Slobodan Praljak

    Winter Olympics PyeongChang 2018 Medal Count
    Country
    Total
    1
    Norway
    99826
    2
    Germany
    95418
    3
    Canada
    55616
    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    5 to Watch: #ShibSibs Return, Bowman Looks to Defend Gold
    ICTY/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
    This series of photos provided by ICTY show former Croatian Gen. Slobodan Praljak drinking a small bottle of liquid he claimed was poison after judges reconfirmed his 20-year prison sentence during a Yugoslav War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague, Netherlands, on Wednesday, Nov. 29, 2017.

    A former Croatian general who died after swallowing a liquid at a war crimes hearing in the Netherlands had cyanide in his system, Dutch prosecutors said after an autopsy was performed Friday.

    Preliminary results from a toxicological test revealed "a concentration of potassium cyanide" in Slobodan Praljak's blood, the Hague Public Prosecutor's Office said in a statement.

    The cyanide caused heart failure, which investigators "pointed out" as the 72-year-old Praljak's "suspected cause of death," according to the prosecutor's statement.

    On Wednesday, Praljak drank from a small bottle that he said contained poison seconds after an appeals judge at the U.N.'s International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia confirmed his 20-year sentence for crimes during the 1992-95 Bosnian war.

    He was pronounced dead at a nearby hospital a little while later.

    Meanwhile, the United Nations tribunal ordered an independent review of its "internal operations" following the dramatic event in its courtroom. The tribunal said its review was meant to complement the ongoing investigation of Praljak's death by Dutch prosecutors.

    The announcement came after Croatia's justice minister raised doubts about whether security and medical staff at the tribunal responded quickly enough when Praljak raised the bottle to his lips with a trembling right hand and consumed its contents.

    Before the toxicological test results came back, Dutch prosecutors had confirmed the bottle carried a toxic chemical. It remains unclear how Praljak, who was in custody before the hearing, obtained the substance and managed to smuggle it into the courtroom.

    The tribunal's review will begin next week and be led by Hassan Jallow, a former prosecutor with the U.N.'s Rwanda war crimes tribunal. It aims to file a report by Dec. 31, when the tribunal formally closes its doors, having completed all its cases.

    The court says Jallow "is mandated to undertake an assessment of relevant existing procedures as well as make any recommendations which may assist other courts in the future."

    Tribunal spokesman Nenad Golcevski said it is not the first time such a probe has been ordered by the court.

    "Similar internal reviews have been initiated, for example, after the death of Slobodan Milosevic," Golcevski said, referring to the former Yugoslav president who died in his tribunal cell in 2006 before judges could deliver verdicts in his trial.

    Two Croatian experts observed the autopsy on Praljak's body at the tribunal's request.

    Late Thursday, Croatian Justice Minister Drazen Bosnjakovic said the country would ask Dutch authorities to be included in the ongoing investigation into Praljak's death.

    Bosnjakovic told Croatia's state TV that "much remains unclear, including how the poison was taken in, why security didn't react in time and why medical help arrived so late." He added that Croatia wants "all facts cleared about this tragic event."

    Praljak's defense lawyer, Nika Pinter, told Croatia's Nova TV she did not know how Praljak managed to get the bottle past security.

    "But that was his decision, his decision," Pinter said. "He would not want to live for one day with handcuffs on his hands, and (the) stigma of war criminal on his back."