Illinois

Mayoral Candidates Threaten Legal Action Over Exclusion From Thursday Debate

A prime-time televised debate in the Chicago mayor’s race is running into a legal challenge. Almost two-thirds of the mayoral ballot has been excluded from a forum set to take place Thursday night, and Amara Enyia and Paul Vallas are fighting to be included.

Lawyers for Enyia and the former Chicago Public Schools CEO both sent cease and desist letters to Fox 32, who is hosting the debate in conjunction with the Lincoln Forum, arguing their exclusion puts them at a disadvantage, and that the forum’s sponsors “are essentially endorsing specific candidates as ‘legitimate.’”

The candidates have complained that their campaigns have not been told what polling data is being used to determine the top five candidates despite requesting it.

The most recent poll, released by the Chicago Sun-Times on Jan. 25, showed the five front-runners are Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, who is leading with 12.7 percent, Bill Daley with 12.1 percent, former Board of Education Chairman Gery Chico with 9.3 percent, Willie Wilson with 9 percent and Illinois Comptroller Susana Mendoza with 8.7 percent.

The other nine candidates on the ballot were not invited to the $35-per-ticket forum being held at the Union League Club.

Vallas called the decision to exclude the nine candidates “blatantly unfair” and threatened to file a lawsuit against the debate sponsors “just to make a point.”

“The Lincoln Forum notified all the announced mayoral candidates several weeks ago regarding the selection process for participants in the upcoming Candidate Forum,” the Lincoln Forum said in a statement. “At that time no candidate voiced any objection or concerns regarding participant selection.”

The Sun-Times poll was conducted before Circuit Court Clerk Dorothy Brown, who was polling at 4.7 percent, was kicked off the ballot, leading to questions of whether or not supporters of Brown could have boosted another candidate into the top five had the poll been conducted more recently.

Enyia polled at 3.1 percent, but Brown endorsed her after she was kicked off the ballot. If all of Brown’s supporters flocked to Enyia, she could be within a knife’s edge of the top five.

“The voices of all our supporters, including the 62,000 who signed our petitions (…) they deserve to have their voices represented in a debate,” Enyia said at a press conference Monday. “We still have to be afforded the same exposure, the same time to respond to questions and the same format.”

At 25.8 percent, the largest group of voters are those still undecided.

Vallas said he was feeling a bit like “chopped liver” after being left out of the forum on his way to a press conference Monday.

“We have an election where none of the candidates, not one, has more than 14 percent in the polls,” Vallas said. “It’s not like we’ve got a lot of fringe candidates running around with 3 or 4 percent of the vote and we’ve got candidates who’ve got 50, 60, 70 percent of the vote. So c’mon now.”

Vallas also said the debate’s sponsors could be in violation of the Fairness Doctrine, a Federal Communications Commission mandate that said broadcasters had to present public issues in a fair and balanced light. The policy was eliminated in 1987.

Contact Us