NBC Chicago /

News

Feds Deny Professor's Pot-For-Research Bid

Updated 6:45 PM CDT, Mon, Jan 12, 2009

Lyle Craker has challenged the government's monopoly on research marijuana.

 

The Drug Enforcement Administration has rejected a petition by a University of Massachusetts-Amherst professor to let him grow marijuana for medical research.

The DEA's Jan. 7 ruling said Lyle Craker, a horticulturist who heads the university's medicinal plant program, failed to demonstrate that the government's longtime monopoly on producing and distributing the drug for medical research was "inadequate."

DEA spokesman Garrison Courtney on Monday confirmed the ruling, but declined further comment.

Craker challenged the government's monopoly on research marijuana. A lab at the University of Mississippi is the government's only marijuana-growing facility.

Craker's suit claimed government-grown marijuana lacks the potency medical researchers need to make important breakthroughs. He also alleged there wasn't enough of the drug freely available for scientists across the country to work with.

The professor has won support from Massachusetts Sens. Edward Kennedy and John Kerry as well as several other members of Congress.

Craker in 2001 submitted an application as a marijuana manufacturer to the DEA.

A federal administrative law judge in 2007 recommended to the DEA that it grant Craker's application to grow marijuana in bulk for use by scientists in Food and Drug Administration-approved research. That nonbinding ruling said the government's supply was inadequate for medical research.

DEA attorneys have defended the government's marijuana, saying its Mississippi growing center provides adequate quality and quantity for legitimate researchers across the country.

Craker has said his case has been hurt by DEA concerns about the drug falling into the hands of students. He said he was confident security measures could be used at UMass to prevent that from happening.

"With one foot out the door, the Bush administration has once again found time to undermine scientific freedom," said Allen Hopper, litigation director of the American Civil Liberties Union Drug Law Reform Project. "In stubbornly retaining the unique government monopoly over the supply of research marijuana over the objections of DEA's own administrative law judge, the Bush administration has effectively blocked the proper regulatory channels that would allow the drug to become a wholly legitimate prescription medication."

Copyright Associated Press

Comments (2)

Sort by: Most Recent | Oldest
  • kelprod Monday, Jan 12 at 8:53 PM FLAG COMMENT A perfect example of how big federal government is destroying America. Drugs should be legalized and taxed. Eliminate entirely the DEA and disband the biggest waste of money in the history of time- the US "war on drugs". Push drug laws down to the state level. Besides savings hundreds of billions of dollars, it would free up prison space, court space, police resources, drastically reduce violent crime and actually create a rev ... MORE >
  • Anonymous Monday, Jan 12 at 8:20 PM FLAG COMMENT I was prescribed some mild painkillers because I could not take the stronger ones due to nausea. Some of the possible side effects of the new ones, rectal bleeding, bleeding in the stomach, increase risk of heart attack, increased risk of blood clots and of course nausea. So how is this better than medicinal marijuana? So where has this war on drugs gotten us? Nowhere but poorer.

Post a Comment

Name


Comment - You have 2000 characters left

Enter both words below, separated by a space, in the field located to the lower right. Can't read the words below? Try different words or an audio captcha. What's this?