Adulterers Not Welcome at the Super Bowl

By JOSH ALPER
Updated 6:38 PM CST, Thu, Jan 15, 2009

TWITTER FACEBOOK

Getty Images

"Cheaters never prosper." We've all heard that old chestnut before, but you might not be familiar with a new twist on that. Web sites promoting cheating on your spouse do prosper, although money isn't enough for them to do business with the National Football League.

AshleyMadison.com, a dating site that matches married people interested in having affairs, signed a six-figure contract to purchase ad space in the Super Bowl game program last month. The ad, featuring a ton of cleavage obscuring a football helmet, asks "Who are you doing after the game?"

When news of that purchase made its way to the NFL offices, though, it was met with a sour face and a rejection. Noel Biderman, CEO of the site, told CNBC's Darren Rovell that he was told the company would never be allowed to advertise in an NFL publication.

"I find the rejection to be ridiculous given that a huge percentage of the NFL's marketing content is for products like alcohol, which they sell in their stadiums, promote on their air and clearly have in the magazine," Biderman said. "That's a product that literally kills tens of thousands of people each year. So if the NFL is worried about legislating behavior and regulating what their audience should be exposed to then it should start with a ban on all alcohol advertising and products being sold, not AshleyMadison.com."

The whole "NFL is hyprocritical" angle is a dog that just ain't gonna hunt. Of course they're hypocritical. They fine players for big hits while using those hits to promote their game as gladiatorial combat. They promote character and values while finding place for Pacman Jones and, yes, they promote alcohol use even though it leads to all sorts of terrible things.

If any of those decisions hurt their business one bit, they'd start doing the opposite. That's the way business works. The NFL can be pretty sure that refusing to do business with AshleyMadison.com won't lead to criticism from anyone but Mr. Biderman, so there's no reason for them to enter into the arrangement.

First Published: Jan 15, 2009 12:46 PM CST

TWITTER FACEBOOK

  • 0% furious 0
  • 0% sad 0
  • 0% bored 0
  • 0% thrilled 0
  • 0% intrigued 0
  • 0% laughing 0
processing
          No comments have been posted yet.

          You have 2000 characters left

          processing
          So My City

          You are posting in (change)

          550/550 characters

          (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)

          (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)
          *Tip: You can also post moments via email or Twitter.

          processing

          View Your Moment in

          Posted by | 1 second ago

          Don't Miss

          local_beat

          Nov 21, 2009

          Chicago's Week in Photos

          A suicide stuns the city. The 70s rock the South Side. A boy celebrates Christmas.

          local_beat

          Nov 20, 2009

          Oprah Departure Another Blow to Windy City

          A staggering economy, a failed Olympic bid and the loss of two major trade shows. Is Chicago in a funk?

          Read It

          local_beat

          1 minute ago

          Hundreds Pay Respects to Michael Scott

          A who's who of Chicago pay respects to the CPS president

          Read It
          Loading...
          Birthdate:
          You must be at least 13 to sign up.
          Gender:
          invalid

          By clicking the button below, I accept the terms of use and privacy policy

          Already Signed Up? Login Below.

          processing
          Here's what we're posting:

          *Only used for verification. We do not store your password.
          processing