Oprah has a right to be ticked off.
She makes $275 million a year (the most of any entertainer). She's guaranteed of appearing on at least one magazine cover per month (albeit her own). She's got her own satellite cable network -- and is working on cable station of her own. So, she gets knocked down to No. 2 on Forbes' "Celebrity 100"? What the heck?
She "loses" out to Angelina Jolie who, Forbes says, "has always been able to attract tabloid attention and Oscar nods,
Oh, wait, let's not forgot one small thing: In 2008, the notoriously cautious, apolitical mega-star steps out of her comfort zone and decides to endorse a political candidate for the first time: Barack Obama. Hmmm....how did that work out?
Not only did Obama win -- he ends up as Forbes' No. 49 celebrity (the magazine rewards him for his book sales -- and web hits)!! Once again, Oprah Winfrey managed to help elect Barack Obama who -- it has been reported -- is the nation's first black president.
And who did Jolie manage to drag onto the celebrity list? (Brad doesn't count.) Exactly how does Forbes justify this? Was the list fixed after all of Jolie's kids voted for mom? Who did the tabulating -- AIG accountants?
As if the public didn't need more reason to be skeptical about the great "wisdom" of the capitalist geniuses. The lesson from this choice -- a mother of six who makes one-tenth that of a one-woman mega-corporation is "worth" more? That might be a nice message for the "traditional values" folks, but for a business magazine?