Burris: Absolutely No Quid Pro Quo

Burris says senators asked him to testify before Impeachment Committee

By ZACH CHRISTMAN

Updated 1:44 PM CST, Thu, Jul 30, 2009

Print Email Share TWITTER FACEBOOK

U.S. Senate appointee Roland Burris told the House Impeachment Committee on Thursday there was absolutely no kind of deal between him and Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

Burris was subpoenaed to testify Wednesday, but delayed his appearance until after he traveled to Washington to try to be seated as Illinois' newest senator. In a scene of pure political theater, he was turned away, but the mood later turned more conciliatory, after he met with Democratic leaders.

After he was sworn in before the committee, Burris was asked if he'd read the federal corruption complaint against Blagojevich. Burris said he had not, and added that he hasn't had a conversation with Blagojevich since the press conference announcing his appointment on Dec. 30.

With frequent whispers in his ear from his attorney, Burris answered most of the questions put to him, sometimes referring to the affidavit he filed with the committee earlier this week, and other times artfully dodging them.

Burris: There Was No Quid Pro Quo

WATCH

Burris: There Was No Quid Pro Quo

Burris: "I Have Not Read the Federal Complaint"

WATCH

Burris: "I Have Not Read the Federal Complaint"

Burris: "I Did Not Talk to Blago or His Staff Before Arrest"

WATCH

Burris: "I Did Not Talk to Blago or His Staff Before Arrest"

One of the committee members, Rep. Mary Flowers, began her questions by congratulating Burris on his "distinguished" career, and how he handled the media circus yesterday in Washington, D.C. After cozying up to Burris, Flowers asked him only one question: Was there any kind of quid pro quo for his Senate appointment.

"There was nothing legal ... personal ... or political exhanged in return for my appointment to this seat," Burris said, repeating the first three parts after Flowers. "Absolutely, positively not."

Burris disclosed more information about his Wednesday meeting with Senate leaders Harry Reid and Dick Durbin. He said the senators told him that before he could be seated, they "would like me to appear here before this distinguished committee, and we have to get the signature of the secretary of state" on the appointment documents.

"Upon those clearing up, they indicated my documentation would go to the rules committee," he said.

Burris said whether he would run for re-election in 2010, when the remainder of Obama's former Senate term is up, did not come up during his conversation with Senate leadership.

Many of the questions centered around his work as a lobbyist and consulting firm, which had some contract work with the state. Burris told the committee he has resigned all of his lobbying registrations, and only ever had "small contracts" with Illinois.

Rep. Jim Durkin said Burris was the recipient of the single largest contribution that was made to a campaign in Illinois history, and the company that made it also contributed to Blagojevich.

"Telephone USA Investments made a $1.2 million contribution to Burris in the 2002 campaign. The only other person to receive a contribution from Telephone USA Investments ever was Rod Blagojevich," Durkin said.

Durkin said the company was run by a man named Robert Stroud. Burris countered, saying Stroud made a loan and not a contribution to the Burris campaign, and that loan is still outstanding.

"I have no other relationship with what Mr. Stroud does with his money," Burris said.

Burris said the campaign committee no longer exists, and he has no way to repay the money. He said he hasn't heard "a word" from Mr. Stroud about the money.

After Burris was dismissed, the committee took a short break and immediately began voting on whether to recommend impeaching the governor.