City's Landmark Law Ruled "Unconstitutionally Vague"

Friday, Jan 30, 2009  |  Updated 10:45 PM CDT
View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print
City's Landmark Law Ruled "Unconstitutionally Vague"

Getty Images

The ruling does not immediately invalidate the ordinance, which will remain in effect until the case is over.

advertisement
Photos and Videos

City's Landmark Law Ruled "Unconstitutionally Vague"

An appellate court ruling puts in jeopardy the city?s protection of more than 250 buildings and 50 historic districts.
More Photos and Videos

An Illinois appellate court has struck down the city of Chicago’s landmarks ordinance, saying it is unconstitutionally vague, putting in jeopardy the city’s protection of more than 250 buildings and 50 historic districts.

The ordinance, which was enacted in 1968, prohibits any demolition or alteration of properties that are designated landmarks by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, an eight-member body appointed by the mayor.

The commission, whose decisions can be overturned by the Chicago City Council, makes landmark designations based on seven standards that the court found violated the Illinois Constitution because they were too vague.

Thomas Corfman has full details on ChicagoBusiness.com.

Get the latest headlines sent to your inbox!
View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print
Leave Comments
What's New
Get Our Weather App
Stay ahead of the storm with the NBC... Read more
Follow Us
Sign up to receive news and updates that matter to you.
Send Us Your Story Tips
Check Out