Ebert Gives Roeper Comment Thumbs Down

Roeper explains "creative freedom" comment about former show

By MARCUS RILEY
Updated 11:36 AM CST, Sat, Nov 28, 2009

TWITTER FACEBOOK

Associated Press

It's all over but the shouting.

Infamous Chicago Sun-Times movie reviewer Richard Roeper is fumbling to explain himself after making what former partner Roger Ebert felt were derisive comments about the popular show they once hosted together.

In a Vocolo.org story about a new show he's headlining on Starz, Roeper told media commentator Robert Feder "As much as I loved doing ‘Ebert & Roeper,’ this will have much more of an unfiltered, uncut, viral feel ... If a film is a piece of sh*%, I'll say it's a piece of sh$*."

Ebert said he felt a "twinge" at Roeper's comment, addressing his former TV partner directly in his own Sun-Times blog on Wednesday.

Searching for the Ultimate Redhead

Searching for the Ultimate Redhead
WATCH

Searching for the Ultimate Redhead

    Richard, were you not uncut at E&R? Did you never say a movie was "a piece of s&*t?" On the web and cable you can use that very word, of course, as you do in your web site's promo for your new enterprise, promising to review "a lot of big movies, and some smaller, sh*&ty ones as well.

Ebert went on to say that Roeper had the creative freedom on the show to refer to a film as a piece of excrement as he pleased.

Roeper went into full clarification mode on his own blog and on Twitter Friday, saying it wasn't his "intention to disparage the amazing experience I had as Roger’s co-host, or to imply I was creatively stifled."

Roeper says he was referring to "creative differences" he sometimes had with producers of the show.

He says his new premium cable and Internet show will give him "more freedom in terms of language," but that doesn't mean he'll be "cussing like a Tarantino character" every week.

"When I said 'uncut, unfiltered,' etc., I just meant I'll be delivering the reviews in a casual setting, in a conversational tone," Roeper said.

Roeper also explained a portion of his comment as a "lame attempt at humor."

And in pure Web 2.0 fashion, Ebert later responded to Roeper's explanation on his own Twitter feed, saying "Well said, Rich."

Apparently, on the Internets, there's a lot of cleaning up to do when the sh*% hits the fan.

Roger Ebert left "Ebert & Roeper" in 2006 due to health problems. Roeper walked away last year.

First Published: Nov 28, 2009 8:05 AM CST

TWITTER FACEBOOK

  • 50% bored 14
  • 21% laughing 6
  • 11% furious 3
  • 11% intrigued 3
  • 4% thrilled 1
  • 4% sad 1
processing
      No comments have been posted yet.

      You have 2000 characters left

      processing
      So My City

      You are posting in (change)

      550/550 characters

      (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)

      (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)
      *Tip: You can also post moments via email or Twitter.

      processing

      View Your Moment in

      Posted by | 1 second ago

      Don't Miss

      popcornbiz

      Feb 9, 2010

      Michael Emerson: Ben Linus' "Lost" Survival "Unlikely"

      Could the cold-blooded killer Ben Linus become a "Lost" casualty? Michael Emerson believes the stars are aligned for a nasty end. Then again, maybe not.

      Read It

      celebrity

      Feb 9, 2010

      Celebrity Hookups: Carrie Prejean Engaged to NFL Quarterback

      Check out which celebrities are hooking up.

      television

      2 hours ago

      See Ya Later, Leno

      Jay Leno's 10 p.m. EST show ends tonight, but the giant-jawed comic will be back in March at his old job, hosting "The Tonight Show."

      Read It
      Loading...
      Birthdate:
      You must be at least 13 to sign up.
      Gender:
      invalid

      By clicking the button below, I accept the terms of use and privacy policy

      Already Signed Up? Login Below.

      processing

      Here's what we're posting:

      *Only used for verification. We do not store your password.
      processing